{ "document_id": 16410, "page": 160, "width_pt": 612, "height_pt": 792, "rotation": 0, "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48", "engine": "paddleocr_vl", "source_run_id": 16524, "item_count": 16, "counts_by_type": { "footer": 2, "heading": 2, "list": 1, "list_item": 4, "text": 6, "title": 1 }, "build_ms": 2, "items": [ { "id": "p160.1", "order": 1, "type": "title", "bbox": { "l": 189.36, "t": 741.12, "r": 426.72, "b": 728.16 }, "text": "II. METHODS AND CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION", "attrs": { "block_label": "doc_title" }, "level": 2 }, { "id": "p160.2", "order": 2, "type": "heading", "bbox": { "l": 65.04, "t": 713.52, "r": 208.56, "b": 700.08 }, "text": "A. Criteria and Guidelines", "attrs": { "block_label": "paragraph_title" }, "level": 3 }, { "id": "p160.3", "order": 3, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 64.32, "t": 685.92, "r": 539.76, "b": 574.8 }, "text": "The Comprehensive Evaluation System culminates in a conference between the unit administrator and the faculty member. The process includes administrative evaluation, allowing the faculty member and the chairperson, director, or dean to discuss the faculty member's strengths as well as the areas which require improvement. Administrative evaluation shall be based on the self-evaluation, student evaluations, peer review, and direct observation by the chairperson or dean as appropriate. The bases of the evaluation are the benchmarks set in Form PDP/DEA-1 and the documentation that the faculty member supplies of how well the plan was achieved. Both development and achievements constitute the bases for evaluation." }, { "id": "p160.4", "order": 4, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 64.56, "t": 562.32, "r": 538.8, "b": 492.24 }, "text": "The Comprehensive Evaluation System recognizes the central role of self-evaluation, as it is the faculty member who is most aware of the parameters of his or her teaching, professional competence, and professional duties. Peer Review must be based on the curriculum vitae and optional documentation, and Form PDP/DEA-1 as well, and any classroom visitation must follow the prescribed guidelines." }, { "id": "p160.5", "order": 5, "type": "heading", "bbox": { "l": 65.76, "t": 479.28, "r": 141.84, "b": 465.36 }, "text": "B. Categories", "attrs": { "block_label": "paragraph_title" }, "level": 3 }, { "id": "p160.6", "order": 6, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 64.56, "t": 451.68, "r": 541.92, "b": 409.92 }, "text": "Each faculty member at Kentucky State University shall be evaluated in the relevant performance categories indicated in the Faculty Handbook, Section 2.6, and translated to Form PDP/DEA-1 (as revised with this Proposal). The four categories listed in Section 2.6 of the Faculty Handbook are:" }, { "id": "p160.7", "order": 7, "type": "list", "bbox": { "l": 100.56, "t": 396.72, "r": 418.8, "b": 341.28 }, "text": "", "attrs": { "item_count": 4 }, "children": [ { "id": "p160.7.1", "order": 8, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 100.56, "t": 396.72, "r": 418.8, "b": 382.56 }, "text": "2.6.1.1 Teaching Effectiveness (Professional Competence);", "marker": "1)" }, { "id": "p160.7.2", "order": 9, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 100.8, "t": 382.32, "r": 375.12, "b": 369.36 }, "text": "2.6.1.2 Scholarly Research and Creative Activity;", "marker": "2)" }, { "id": "p160.7.3", "order": 10, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 101.28, "t": 368.64, "r": 221.04, "b": 355.68 }, "text": "2.6.1.3 Service; and", "marker": "3)" }, { "id": "p160.7.4", "order": 11, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 101.28, "t": 354.96, "r": 263.28, "b": 341.28 }, "text": "2.6.1.4 Continuing Growth.", "marker": "4)" } ] }, { "id": "p160.8", "order": 12, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 63.84, "t": 327.36, "r": 547.44, "b": 243.36 }, "text": "For the purposes of this system, the first is referred to as Teaching (for librarians, the category is Professional Competence), the second as Professional Activity, and the third as Service. The first three categories will serve to organize the curriculum vitae and Form PDP/DEA-1. Each of these three areas is considered to incorporate an element of continuing growth, so a separate category for continuing growth has not been placed in the system. Benchmarks for each area will be established according to the procedural guidelines described in Item I.D.6 (above)." }, { "id": "p160.9", "order": 13, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 64.32, "t": 231.12, "r": 544.32, "b": 161.28 }, "text": "Specific levels of performance are to be set by academic units as indicated earlier; some general aspects of each of the three categories that will serve to organize the evaluation areas are described below. For librarians, professional competence is the alternative to teaching effectiveness, and its components are examined separately in 1a. The following items also indicate the appropriate section of Form PDP/DEA-1." }, { "id": "p160.10", "order": 14, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 83.52, "t": 148.32, "r": 537.36, "b": 91.92 }, "text": "1. Teaching: Teaching effectiveness is a primary expectation of faculty at Kentucky State University. According to the Faculty Handbook, decisions for retention, tenure, and promotion must be based first on an affirmative evaluation of teaching effectiveness. The components of teaching effectiveness are articulated in the Faculty Handbook. They" }, { "id": "p160.11", "order": 15, "type": "footer", "bbox": { "l": 295.92, "t": 79.68, "r": 321.12, "b": 68.4 }, "text": "5-26", "attrs": { "block_label": "number" } }, { "id": "p160.12", "order": 16, "type": "footer", "bbox": { "l": 258.48, "t": 47.52, "r": 352.8, "b": 36.96 }, "text": "Page 313 of 723", "attrs": { "block_label": "number" } } ], "excluded_furniture": { "first": [], "last": [] } }