{
    "document_id": 16180,
    "page": 18,
    "width_pt": 306,
    "height_pt": 504,
    "rotation": 0,
    "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48",
    "engine": "paddleocr_vl",
    "source_run_id": 16292,
    "item_count": 4,
    "counts_by_type": {
        "header": 1,
        "text": 3
    },
    "build_ms": 1,
    "items": [
        {
            "id": "p18.1",
            "order": 1,
            "type": "header",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 18.48,
                "t": 469.44,
                "r": 126.48,
                "b": 457.44
            },
            "text": "Disciplinary Cases (cont.)",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "header"
            },
            "level": 2
        },
        {
            "id": "p18.2",
            "order": 2,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 27.6,
                "t": 394.08,
                "r": 294.72,
                "b": 348.48
            },
            "text": "A California Judge’s repeated use of racial slurs was found to have violated the state ethics code, even though most of the remarks were made during in-chambers conferences, and not in open court. In re Stevens, 6445 P. 2d 99, 100 (Cal. 1982)."
        },
        {
            "id": "p18.3",
            "order": 3,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 27.84,
                "t": 342,
                "r": 290.4,
                "b": 273.12
            },
            "text": "A former Pennsylvania Magisterial District Judge was reprimanded for making racially and ethnically derogatory statements about minority members of the community in the presence of his staff. He also was reprimanded for his practice of publicly criticizing his female staff members while using derogatory and demeaning language. In re Brown, 907 A.2d 684 (Pa. Ct. Jud. Disc. 2006)."
        },
        {
            "id": "p18.4",
            "order": 4,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 27.84,
                "t": 266.88,
                "r": 294.72,
                "b": 129.36
            },
            "text": "A Special Assistant County Attorney in Minnesota received a private admonition for submitting a Motion in Limine to the Court in which she asked the Court to prohibit the defense from hiring a person of color to help in representing the Defendant. The request resulted from a conversation between the Special Assistant County Attorney and the Defense Attorney in which race was discussed as an issue in the case. The Defendant was African American and he was charged with robbing a Caucasian couple. The Special Assistant County Attorney filed the motion to prevent the defense from hiring an attorney of color “for the sole purpose of playing upon the emotions of the jury.” In re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Contained in Panel File 98-26, 597 N.W.2d 563, 566 (Minn. 1999)."
        }
    ],
    "excluded_furniture": {
        "first": [],
        "last": [
            {
                "id": "p18.f1",
                "order": 5,
                "type": "footer",
                "bbox": {
                    "l": 26.88,
                    "t": 18.72,
                    "r": 35.52,
                    "b": 11.52
                },
                "text": "18",
                "attrs": {
                    "block_label": "number"
                }
            }
        ]
    }
}