{
    "document_id": 15693,
    "page": 3,
    "width_pt": 612,
    "height_pt": 792,
    "rotation": 0,
    "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48",
    "engine": "paddleocr_vl",
    "source_run_id": 15804,
    "item_count": 10,
    "counts_by_type": {
        "header": 1,
        "heading": 1,
        "text": 8
    },
    "build_ms": 1,
    "items": [
        {
            "id": "p3.1",
            "order": 1,
            "type": "header",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 533.28,
                "t": 753.84,
                "r": 541.2,
                "b": 744
            },
            "text": "3",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "number"
            },
            "level": 2
        },
        {
            "id": "p3.2",
            "order": 2,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.64,
                "t": 719.28,
                "r": 531.84,
                "b": 622.08
            },
            "text": "Chair Glass spoke briefly about the action item on eliminated sick leave hours that had been passed at the previous senate meeting. She went on to describe the second action item that had been proposed for that meeting but which had not been addressed due to time constraints and issues with establishing a forum. This second item called for the joining of tenure and promotion. Consultant Cary Nelson had recommended this action as well. While PCC is looking at the Faculty Handbook overall, it wanted to be sure this item in particular would be reviewed by the Board."
        },
        {
            "id": "p3.3",
            "order": 3,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 69.12,
                "t": 608.64,
                "r": 354.48,
                "b": 595.2
            },
            "text": "The resolution passed with all in favor and one abstention."
        },
        {
            "id": "p3.4",
            "order": 4,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.4,
                "t": 581.28,
                "r": 538.32,
                "b": 414.48
            },
            "text": "Chair Glass then discussed the faculty annual review rubric that PCC had provided to Dr. Jackson and Chairs for review. This form lists criteria by which faculty will be judged. Points will be awarded appropriately depending on which items the faculty member fulfills or achieves. In preparing this criteria, PCC reviewed divisional benchmarks. The numerical scoring has been developed so that a faculty member in meeting criteria “meets expectations,” although it is also possible that a faculty member could exceed expectations. In doing so, PCC reasoned, faculty may be made eligible for merit pay if that incentive system returns. Consideration was put into being sure the form could be used across the university, including for individuals who have research as a formal component of their appointment. Alternative forms of assessing scholarly productivity were also consulted while developing the form, specifically the Boyers model. Chair Glass stressed that this was not a voting item, but rather being presented as an information item. She encouraged questions and comments to be sent to her through email."
        },
        {
            "id": "p3.5",
            "order": 5,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 69.6,
                "t": 401.52,
                "r": 371.28,
                "b": 387.84
            },
            "text": "A motion to extended time for 2 minutes passed unanimously."
        },
        {
            "id": "p3.6",
            "order": 6,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.4,
                "t": 374.16,
                "r": 537.6,
                "b": 290.64
            },
            "text": "A senator expressed appreciation for the work that has gone into this document and praised the fact that it encourages a more objective form of assessment. He inquired if this item had been considered in light of the post-tenure review process. Chair Glass said it had not. He also pointed out that some tasks, such as coordinating a program, are paid positions. A guest pointed out, however, that this is not always true and that coordinators in LLP, for example, do not receive pay."
        },
        {
            "id": "p3.7",
            "order": 7,
            "type": "heading",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 69.6,
                "t": 277.44,
                "r": 183.36,
                "b": 263.76
            },
            "text": "5. President’s report",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "paragraph_title"
            },
            "level": 3
        },
        {
            "id": "p3.8",
            "order": 8,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.16,
                "t": 250.32,
                "r": 539.28,
                "b": 180.48
            },
            "text": "In responding to a petition delivered to her on 2/27, President Sipes reviewed the senate policies by which a petition consisting of 20% of the faculty can be submitted to request a full faculty meeting to address an action of senate. Since the petition from 2/27 did not call for this action, it was unclear as to how to respond. President Sipes consulted with General Counsel Gordon Rowe on the issue."
        },
        {
            "id": "p3.9",
            "order": 9,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.64,
                "t": 167.04,
                "r": 538.08,
                "b": 125.28
            },
            "text": "A senator expressed frustration with senate not observing written policies, such as sufficient notice for an upcoming meeting. He believed policies were followed inconsistently, although he conceded that in some cases policies do not exist to offer guidance on appropriate actions."
        },
        {
            "id": "p3.10",
            "order": 10,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.64,
                "t": 112.08,
                "r": 536.16,
                "b": 84.48
            },
            "text": "President of FCC Dr. Roosevelt Shelton explained that while some who signed the petition also have concern with how it was delivered, the main issue is how it was responded to and a lack of"
        }
    ],
    "excluded_furniture": {
        "first": [],
        "last": []
    }
}