{ "document_id": 15660, "page": 4, "width_pt": 612, "height_pt": 792, "rotation": 0, "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48", "engine": "paddleocr_vl", "source_run_id": 15771, "item_count": 14, "counts_by_type": { "footer": 1, "header": 1, "heading": 2, "list": 1, "list_item": 8, "text": 1 }, "build_ms": 2, "items": [ { "id": "p4.1", "order": 1, "type": "header", "bbox": { "l": 224.16, "t": 750.72, "r": 387.36, "b": 738.72 }, "text": "FACULTY SENATE MINUTES 3/18/19", "attrs": { "block_label": "header" }, "level": 2 }, { "id": "p4.2", "order": 2, "type": "list", "bbox": { "l": 68.64, "t": 720, "r": 576.24, "b": 231.84 }, "text": "", "attrs": { "item_count": 8 }, "children": [ { "id": "p4.2.1", "order": 3, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 69.12, "t": 720, "r": 568.32, "b": 691.68 }, "text": "revision, the job would fall to the Secretary. The “revisions” are just updating the Handbook with what has passed Senate." }, { "id": "p4.2.2", "order": 4, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 69.12, "t": 678.24, "r": 576.24, "b": 622.08 }, "text": "A Senator stated that we must have the policies and procedures in our hands before we revise the Handbook. Otherwise, revision of the Handbook will just be busywork. No further work should go forward on the Handbook until we have the binding policies, specifically. What is the point of making changes to the Handbook if those changes are not policy. The administration needs to get us the policies.", "marker": "-" }, { "id": "p4.2.3", "order": 5, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 69.12, "t": 609.84, "r": 569.52, "b": 567.84 }, "text": "Moffett replied that he would send our questions to Carlsen-Landy for answers, but this action item is just about Senate policies going into the Handbook—policies such as the revised Academic Calendar that we just passed.", "marker": "-" }, { "id": "p4.2.4", "order": 6, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 68.88, "t": 554.4, "r": 557.04, "b": 526.08 }, "text": "Another senator asked, what is involved in the Senate President revising the Handbook? Is it major revisions or just archiving policies?", "marker": "-" }, { "id": "p4.2.5", "order": 7, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 69.6, "t": 518.64, "r": 569.52, "b": 476.88 }, "text": "Moffett replied that, until we have a website or some transparent location for policy, we need to put these Senate changes in the Handbook as a repository. The Handbook will remain in place as guidance, as an archive of Senate decisions.", "marker": "-" }, { "id": "p4.2.6", "order": 8, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 68.64, "t": 469.68, "r": 576.24, "b": 316.8 }, "text": "Guest Beverly Schneller, Vice Provost, stated that the revision work which Academic Affairs has been engaged in involves updating some of the descriptions/definitions of employment types, etc. Academic Affairs is not adding any policies or additional information. We have tried to use the Handbook for accreditation, but we find that there are inconsistencies in the Handbook. Regarding the “non-binding” issue, the language of the General Counsel is different from the language that we use. What we are trying to do, fundamentally, is to get all policy that is now in effect consistently stated and then try to verify it across the Catalogue, across policy locations. This Action Item designates a person responsible for adding Senate decisions relevant to policy to go into the Handbook. Right now, there is no repository for these Senate decisions. Our work is purely and clearly editorial and focused on alignment and transparent. Items like the Academic Calendar and the university organization chart that should go in a handbook are not currently in ours. We need to fix this.", "marker": "-" }, { "id": "p4.2.7", "order": 9, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 70.32, "t": 309.84, "r": 276.96, "b": 295.92 }, "text": "10 minutes were added to the discussion.", "marker": "-" }, { "id": "p4.2.8", "order": 10, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 69.84, "t": 287.52, "r": 569.52, "b": 231.84 }, "text": "A Guest noted that the last person officially designated to update the Handbook was former Administrative Assistant Melanie Halliday. Then the task went to the Senate President to add Items from PCC into the Handbook. This new Action Item legitimizes what Senate has been doing by default already.", "marker": "-" } ] }, { "id": "p4.3", "order": 11, "type": "heading", "bbox": { "l": 70.32, "t": 224.16, "r": 279.84, "b": 211.2 }, "text": "VOTE: unanimous yes with no abstentions", "attrs": { "block_label": "paragraph_title" }, "level": 3 }, { "id": "p4.4", "order": 12, "type": "heading", "bbox": { "l": 34.08, "t": 203.28, "r": 470.88, "b": 188.88 }, "text": "6. Curriculum Committee: Chair Leigh Whittinghill reported on the following issues:", "attrs": { "block_label": "paragraph_title" }, "level": 3 }, { "id": "p4.5", "order": 13, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 50.64, "t": 180.48, "r": 577.92, "b": 96.72 }, "text": "- CC 18-19-28: ENG 101 R: This course would combine ENG 103: College Reading with ENG 101: Freshman Composition. The combined course is currently being piloted this semester, and its feasibility and student progress in the course are being assessed. If the pilot is deemed successful, ENG 101R would be added to the schedule this Fall, and students who placed into ENG 103 would be put in this “R” section of 101, fulfilling both their 101 and 103 requirements upon passing the course. This is a four credit course. The other students will take the regular ENG 101." }, { "id": "p4.6", "order": 14, "type": "footer", "bbox": { "l": 569.52, "t": 60.72, "r": 577.2, "b": 51.12 }, "text": "4", "attrs": { "block_label": "number" } } ], "excluded_furniture": { "first": [], "last": [] } }