{
    "document_id": 15220,
    "page": 29,
    "width_pt": 612,
    "height_pt": 792,
    "rotation": 0,
    "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48",
    "engine": "paddleocr_vl",
    "source_run_id": 15333,
    "item_count": 11,
    "counts_by_type": {
        "footer": 1,
        "heading": 2,
        "list": 1,
        "list_item": 2,
        "text": 5
    },
    "build_ms": 1,
    "items": [
        {
            "id": "p29.1",
            "order": 1,
            "type": "heading",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 37.92,
                "t": 718.8,
                "r": 209.76,
                "b": 704.4
            },
            "text": "• Options of the Evaluators:",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "paragraph_title"
            },
            "level": 3
        },
        {
            "id": "p29.2",
            "order": 2,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.4,
                "t": 691.2,
                "r": 527.76,
                "b": 620.88
            },
            "text": "Accept with Comment. The institution has adequately described the initial goals and intended outcomes of its QEP, discussed the limited changes made in the QEP, and discussed the impact on student learning and/or the environment supporting student learning, and described what the institution has learned as a result of the QEP experience. No additional report is required."
        },
        {
            "id": "p29.3",
            "order": 3,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.64,
                "t": 608.64,
                "r": 535.68,
                "b": 496.32
            },
            "text": "Refer to a C & R Committee for review. The institution did not adequately document the implementation of its plan and/or summarize the level of success in achieving the desired impact on student learning and/or the environment supporting student learning, and/or reflect upon the implementation of the QEP as a learning experience for the institution. The institution is requested to provide an additional report in twelve months that documents progress in implementing its QEP. The Report is forwarded to a C & R Committee for action. Actions may include no additional monitoring, additional monitoring, or imposition of a sanction."
        },
        {
            "id": "p29.4",
            "order": 4,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.4,
                "t": 484.8,
                "r": 538.56,
                "b": 329.76
            },
            "text": "Review of Off-Campus Instructional Sites initiated since Last Reaffirmation. An institution is requested to undergo a COC committee review of previously unvisited off-campus instructional sites that were initiated since the institution’s last reaffirmation and where students can obtain 50% or more of coursework toward the completion of an educational program. The areas of evaluation as applicable to the off-campus instructional site(s) include: (1) faculty qualifications and access, (2) qualifications of administrative and academic officials leading activities and programs at the site(s), (3) student services, (4) library/learning resource accessibility and sufficiency, (5) physical facilities supporting the programs, and (6) student learning outcomes compared to similar programs offered on the main campus. The institution should use the Commission form “Documentation prepared by the Institution for the review committee.”"
        },
        {
            "id": "p29.5",
            "order": 5,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 70.32,
                "t": 318,
                "r": 519.6,
                "b": 289.2
            },
            "text": "Review Committee Examining Off-Campus Sites as Part of a Fifth-Year Interim Report."
        },
        {
            "id": "p29.6",
            "order": 6,
            "type": "list",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 87.12,
                "t": 276.78,
                "r": 530.64,
                "b": 177.6
            },
            "text": "",
            "attrs": {
                "item_count": 2
            },
            "children": [
                {
                    "id": "p29.6.1",
                    "order": 7,
                    "type": "list_item",
                    "bbox": {
                        "l": 87.84,
                        "t": 276.78,
                        "r": 521.28,
                        "b": 247.92
                    },
                    "text": "Evaluators: C & R Committee composed of elected members of the Board of Trustees.",
                    "marker": "-"
                },
                {
                    "id": "p29.6.2",
                    "order": 8,
                    "type": "list_item",
                    "bbox": {
                        "l": 87.12,
                        "t": 234.53999999999996,
                        "r": 530.64,
                        "b": 177.6
                    },
                    "text": "Options of the Evaluators: (1) Continue accreditation, no additional report, (2) Continue accreditation with a monitoring report, or (3) Recommend placing the institution on a sanction, with a monitoring report, with or without a visit to campus.",
                    "marker": "•"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "id": "p29.7",
            "order": 9,
            "type": "heading",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 70.08,
                "t": 164.4,
                "r": 300.24,
                "b": 150.24
            },
            "text": "Detailed Update on Programs Reviewed",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "paragraph_title"
            },
            "level": 3
        },
        {
            "id": "p29.8",
            "order": 10,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.64,
                "t": 136.8,
                "r": 533.28,
                "b": 66.96
            },
            "text": "Academic Affairs engaged in several major undertakings during the 2014-15 academic year. Among them was the commitment to conduct program reviews for all academic programs at the University. KSU offers the associate degree in 4 majors, the bachelor degree in 35 majors, and the master's degree in 4 majors. Copies of the program reviews are housed in the Office of Academic Affairs."
        },
        {
            "id": "p29.9",
            "order": 11,
            "type": "footer",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 298.08,
                "t": 61.68,
                "r": 314.16,
                "b": 49.44
            },
            "text": "[9]",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "number"
            }
        }
    ],
    "excluded_furniture": {
        "first": [],
        "last": []
    }
}