{
    "document_id": 15218,
    "page": 71,
    "width_pt": 612,
    "height_pt": 792,
    "rotation": 0,
    "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48",
    "engine": "paddleocr_vl",
    "source_run_id": 15336,
    "item_count": 5,
    "counts_by_type": {
        "footer": 1,
        "heading": 2,
        "text": 2
    },
    "build_ms": 1,
    "items": [
        {
            "id": "p71.1",
            "order": 1,
            "type": "heading",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 69.6,
                "t": 718.8,
                "r": 193.2,
                "b": 705.84
            },
            "text": "What the Data Tells Us?",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "paragraph_title"
            },
            "level": 3
        },
        {
            "id": "p71.2",
            "order": 2,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.4,
                "t": 691.92,
                "r": 540.72,
                "b": 515.52
            },
            "text": "There are sixteen (16) programs at the institution where the faculty to student ratios are lower than 1 to 15. Despite the low ratios for these programs, there is no indication that retention rates for these programs are any better than those programs that are understaffed or adequately staffed. As an example, two of the programs listed in Table 3 are Criminal Justice (1-15) and Child Development (1-42). Many would believe that the program with the lowest ratio (Criminal Justice) would be poised to have the strongest graduation rate. However, Criminal Justice had a 10.3% graduation rate for the 2007 graduation cohort while Child Development registered a graduation rate of 37.5% during the same period. While the faculty to student ratio does not always have an impact on student retention and graduation, it is inferred in this data. There is an opportunity in our ability to drive change in the quality of faculty advisement through professional development and monitoring accountability. These interventions could provide significant impact on our graduation rates."
        },
        {
            "id": "p71.3",
            "order": 3,
            "type": "heading",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 69.6,
                "t": 500.4,
                "r": 162.48,
                "b": 487.2
            },
            "text": "Recommendation",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "paragraph_title"
            },
            "level": 3
        },
        {
            "id": "p71.4",
            "order": 4,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.4,
                "t": 473.76,
                "r": 511.68,
                "b": 385.44
            },
            "text": "The most critical recommendation is for immediate impact to enhance KSU's efficiency of operations and fiscal position is two-fold. First a reduction in the faculty workforce is unavoidable. Secondly, the number of degree programs offered will have to be reduced strategically. KSU should also consider a more interdisciplinary approach to its academic programs. This would reduce or streamline the course work and the members of faculty needed to deliver the course content."
        },
        {
            "id": "p71.5",
            "order": 5,
            "type": "footer",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 298.32,
                "t": 42.72,
                "r": 313.44,
                "b": 30
            },
            "text": "26",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "number"
            }
        }
    ],
    "excluded_furniture": {
        "first": [],
        "last": []
    }
}