{
    "document_id": 15217,
    "page": 12,
    "width_pt": 612,
    "height_pt": 792,
    "rotation": 270,
    "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48",
    "engine": "paddleocr_vl",
    "source_run_id": 15328,
    "item_count": 13,
    "counts_by_type": {
        "header": 1,
        "list": 1,
        "list_item": 5,
        "text": 6
    },
    "build_ms": 2,
    "items": [
        {
            "id": "p12.1",
            "order": 1,
            "type": "header",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 279.36,
                "t": 721.2,
                "r": 532.32,
                "b": 706.8
            },
            "text": "QEP REPORT 02-02-2009 Kentucky State University",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "header"
            },
            "level": 2
        },
        {
            "id": "p12.2",
            "order": 2,
            "type": "list",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 132.72,
                "t": 694.56,
                "r": 456.48,
                "b": 569.04
            },
            "text": "",
            "attrs": {
                "item_count": 5
            },
            "children": [
                {
                    "id": "p12.2.1",
                    "order": 3,
                    "type": "list_item",
                    "bbox": {
                        "l": 132.72,
                        "t": 694.56,
                        "r": 271.44,
                        "b": 681.12
                    },
                    "text": "Project Based Instruction"
                },
                {
                    "id": "p12.2.2",
                    "order": 4,
                    "type": "list_item",
                    "bbox": {
                        "l": 133.2,
                        "t": 669.36,
                        "r": 372,
                        "b": 655.92
                    },
                    "text": "Enhancing Student Engagement in Academics",
                    "marker": "•"
                },
                {
                    "id": "p12.2.3",
                    "order": 5,
                    "type": "list_item",
                    "bbox": {
                        "l": 133.2,
                        "t": 644.4,
                        "r": 409.92,
                        "b": 630.48
                    },
                    "text": "Enhancing Students Through Comprehensive Advising",
                    "marker": "•"
                },
                {
                    "id": "p12.2.4",
                    "order": 6,
                    "type": "list_item",
                    "bbox": {
                        "l": 133.44,
                        "t": 619.44,
                        "r": 294,
                        "b": 606
                    },
                    "text": "Writing Across the Curriculum",
                    "marker": "•"
                },
                {
                    "id": "p12.2.5",
                    "order": 7,
                    "type": "list_item",
                    "bbox": {
                        "l": 133.2,
                        "t": 594,
                        "r": 456.48,
                        "b": 569.04
                    },
                    "text": "Increasing Student Achievement and Retention by Technological Empowerment",
                    "marker": "•"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "id": "p12.3",
            "order": 8,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 116.16,
                "t": 557.04,
                "r": 530.16,
                "b": 460.08
            },
            "text": "The Committee had hoped for more submissions to provide a greater number of choices but selected two that it considered had the most merit for improving student learning within the context of the University. “Project Based Instruction” focused on improving student learning among the large number of developmental students at KSU through projects of interest to students. “Enhancing Students through Comprehensive Advising” sought to provide a significantly more coordinated and comprehensive system of advisory and mentor support for students at the University (Link to QEP_White_Paper_Let_revised.pdf)"
        },
        {
            "id": "p12.4",
            "order": 9,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 115.92,
                "t": 458.88,
                "r": 532.32,
                "b": 323.76
            },
            "text": "After reviewing the white papers in September, the Committee found that neither adequately fulfilled all the requirements stipulated for an acceptable plan and voted unanimously to forward no topic at that time to the Leadership Team. (Link to QEPSelectionCommittee_Minutes_9-18-2007.pdf) The Committee's recourse was to adopt the fallback plan of joining with the QEP Committee for further examination and discussion of (1) new proposals for QEPs submitted after the June deadline; (2) reports on educational issues developed by other campus committees; (3) internal and external program reviews; and (4) student surveys. These various sources, which were made available on the University Blackboard system, provided the joint committees with a wealth of data on which to base a decision for the QEP topic. The next section describes the Committees' findings."
        },
        {
            "id": "p12.5",
            "order": 10,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 116.64,
                "t": 313.44,
                "r": 412.08,
                "b": 300.24
            },
            "text": "Work of the Joint Committees and the Emergence of the Topic"
        },
        {
            "id": "p12.6",
            "order": 11,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 116.64,
                "t": 288.24,
                "r": 533.04,
                "b": 141.36
            },
            "text": "In September the Committee received two proposals that helped shape its final deliberations on the choice of a QEP topic. The chairperson of Literature, Languages, and Philosophy, the largest division at KSU in terms of its developmental and core course offerings, suggested in the first proposal that the University consider enhancing student learning in both gateway and entry level developmental courses, since they were a natural fit and the efforts would be mutually supportive. Gateway classes are those lower-level courses taken by all (or nearly all) students that are considered essential for success in all majors. [Link to GeorgeShields_SACS_SS2007.pdf] Another proposal, originating from the office of the Assistant Vice President of Student Affairs and Enrollment, advocated creating a structure at the University that would aid students in moving from one important transition point in their collegiate careers to another, such as from developmental to regular university courses. [Link to"
        },
        {
            "id": "p12.7",
            "order": 12,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 116.88,
                "t": 142.08,
                "r": 531.12,
                "b": 116.64
            },
            "text": "Roosevelt_QEP_Proposal.pdf] It also linked well with one of the white papers the QEP Selection Committee had earlier considered, which emphasized a project to create"
        },
        {
            "id": "p12.8",
            "order": 13,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 322.8,
                "t": 107.28,
                "r": 329.52,
                "b": 98.64
            },
            "text": "8",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "number"
            }
        }
    ],
    "excluded_furniture": {
        "first": [],
        "last": []
    }
}