{
    "document_id": 14442,
    "page": 16,
    "width_pt": 612,
    "height_pt": 792,
    "rotation": 0,
    "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48",
    "engine": "paddleocr_vl",
    "source_run_id": 14553,
    "item_count": 3,
    "counts_by_type": {
        "heading": 1,
        "text": 2
    },
    "build_ms": 2,
    "items": [
        {
            "id": "p16.1",
            "order": 1,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.88,
                "t": 718.8,
                "r": 542.16,
                "b": 495.36
            },
            "text": "socially. Studies and research states that effective youth programs during a child’s adolescent years significantly impacts the child’s ability to be academically successful in areas such as reading, writing and math. The program is currently not generating consistent amounts of revenue, but overtime with effective resources and marketing of programs the program will begin to generate positive amounts of revenue in comparison to similar regional programs. Over the past few years, the lack of an effective admissions and marketing department has negatively impacted the majority of programs on campus negatively impacting enrollment numbers. In addition, the change in operations across campus when it comes to student debt and holding students with outstanding balances accountable, has impacted the retainment of first- and second-year students. Thus, leading to many students dropping out of the institution completely. The dismantling of the first-year experience program (University College) by the previous administration has begun to negatively impact the ability of the university to retain students after their first and second year. Since the initial program was dismantled, the university has struggled to find consistent leadership to re-establish the program and build effective relationships with first- and second-year students."
        },
        {
            "id": "p16.2",
            "order": 2,
            "type": "heading",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 70.32,
                "t": 487.68,
                "r": 203.76,
                "b": 474
            },
            "text": "(Music Education Review)",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "paragraph_title"
            },
            "level": 3
        },
        {
            "id": "p16.3",
            "order": 3,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.4,
                "t": 465.6,
                "r": 542.88,
                "b": 77.28
            },
            "text": "The Music Education program has seen a sharp decline in student enrollment, due to the same factors as listed above in the CDF review. In addition, the music education program has suffered from leadership issues that have placed constraints on the department. The students from the program are streamlined from the music department after completion of their general education and music requirements. Over the past few years many of the students seeking to become music educators have shifted to graduating strictly from the music department, due to state testing requirements within the education department. To combat these issues the education program has begun to engage the music students before they transition into the department to provide the students with the needed information to be prepared and successful once they transition. To address communication issues, the school has included a music education rep on the KEA-SP Committee (KEA- Student Program) to address any concerns from music education candidates, to communicate important school of education information, to assist in Praxis preparation, and make decisions that will positively impact all music education students. The music education program has graduated one student each of the past three years, but has four students in the EPP (Educator Preparation Program) preparing to enter Student Teaching and four students in the pipeline before entering the EPP. This past semester the music education students along with the Chair and Director of Student Teacher had a great meeting to clarify expectations and requirements for current and potential music education students. The current teacher shortage in music education is so significant that school districts are calling and waiting on our students to graduate to be hired on immediately as full-time educators even if they have not passed the Praxis II exam. The districts are placing the teachers in emergency certified positions with a few years allocated to pass the exam. The relationship with the music department has improved significantly over time and the department is dedicated to assist students in meeting the teaching needs of school districts within and out of the state. To improve enrollment and revenue numbers the school has placed a concerted effort on marketing the program to current and high school students."
        }
    ],
    "excluded_furniture": {
        "first": [],
        "last": []
    }
}