{ "document_id": 13006, "page": 52, "width_pt": 612, "height_pt": 792, "rotation": 0, "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48", "engine": "paddleocr_vl", "source_run_id": 13117, "item_count": 19, "counts_by_type": { "footer": 1, "heading": 3, "list": 3, "list_item": 6, "text": 6 }, "build_ms": 2, "items": [ { "id": "p52.1", "order": 1, "type": "heading", "bbox": { "l": 77.28, "t": 714.48, "r": 264.24, "b": 700.56 }, "text": "Post-Tenure Review Procedures", "attrs": { "block_label": "paragraph_title" }, "level": 3 }, { "id": "p52.2", "order": 2, "type": "list", "bbox": { "l": 89.04, "t": 685.2, "r": 537.36, "b": 606 }, "text": "", "attrs": { "item_count": 2 }, "children": [ { "id": "p52.2.1", "order": 3, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 89.52, "t": 685.2, "r": 535.68, "b": 645.36 }, "text": "The dossier will be submitted via Interfolio to the PTR Committee by February 1, 2023. The provost will provide an orientation to the committee regarding the process and use of discipline specific approved benchmarks.", "marker": "1." }, { "id": "p52.2.2", "order": 4, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 89.04, "t": 632.16, "r": 537.36, "b": 606 }, "text": "After receipt of the materials, the PTR Committee shall state in writing their recommendation for either “exceeds expectations,” “meets expectations,” “needs improvement,” or “unsatisfactory.”", "marker": "2." } ] }, { "id": "p52.3", "order": 5, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 111.6, "t": 591.84, "r": 536.64, "b": 553.2 }, "text": "The categories represent the point per indicator within the category faculty member can earn. The overall average for each category on the rubric found in Appendix D will adhere to the following bands:" }, { "id": "p52.4", "order": 6, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 112.8, "t": 552, "r": 260.88, "b": 539.52 }, "text": "3.00 - 2.50 Exceeds Expectations" }, { "id": "p52.5", "order": 7, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 113.28, "t": 538.8, "r": 253.92, "b": 526.8 }, "text": "2.49 to 2.0 Meets Expectations" }, { "id": "p52.6", "order": 8, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 113.76, "t": 525.6, "r": 258, "b": 513.6 }, "text": "1.99 to 1.0 Needs Improvement" }, { "id": "p52.7", "order": 9, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 114, "t": 512.4, "r": 210.24, "b": 499.92 }, "text": ".99 - 0 Unsatisfactory" }, { "id": "p52.8", "order": 10, "type": "heading", "bbox": { "l": 77.28, "t": 497.76, "r": 412.32, "b": 483.84 }, "text": "Performance Exceeds Expectations or Meets Expectations", "attrs": { "block_label": "paragraph_title" }, "level": 3 }, { "id": "p52.9", "order": 11, "type": "list", "bbox": { "l": 89.28, "t": 468.48, "r": 537.6, "b": 336.96 }, "text": "", "attrs": { "item_count": 2 }, "children": [ { "id": "p52.9.1", "order": 12, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 89.28, "t": 468.48, "r": 537.6, "b": 388.56 }, "text": "The PTR Committee Chair sends the Post-Tenure Review recommendation to the school chair and to the faculty by March 1. The faculty member may respond to the recommendation within 5 days. The school chair sends the Review along with faculty comments to the college dean by March 7 for review and recommendation. The college dean will send all documents and his/her/their recommendation to the provost by April 4 for approval and the approved review is sent to the faculty member, college dean, and school chair for their records by May 1.", "marker": "a." }, { "id": "p52.9.2", "order": 13, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 89.76, "t": 376.32, "r": 520.56, "b": 336.96 }, "text": "If any area under Post-Tenure Review recommendation is “needs improvement” or “unsatisfactory” or if there are compliance infractions, see the relevant performance section below.", "marker": "b." } ] }, { "id": "p52.10", "order": 14, "type": "heading", "bbox": { "l": 77.28, "t": 318, "r": 276, "b": 303.6 }, "text": "Performance Needs Improvement", "attrs": { "block_label": "paragraph_title" }, "level": 3 }, { "id": "p52.11", "order": 15, "type": "list", "bbox": { "l": 89.04, "t": 288.48, "r": 536.64, "b": 103.2 }, "text": "", "attrs": { "item_count": 2 }, "children": [ { "id": "p52.11.1", "order": 16, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 89.04, "t": 288.48, "r": 536.64, "b": 168.72 }, "text": "The PTR Committee Chair sends the Post-Tenure Review recommendation to the school chair and to the faculty member by March 1. The faculty must develop and submit a one-year Faculty Post-tenure Performance Improvement Plan, working with the school chair, to be submitted to the school chair for approval of the recommendation by March 29. The school chair sends the Faculty Post-tenure Performance Improvement Plan and the other post-tenure review documents to the college dean for review and approval of the recommendation by April 4. The college dean sends the faculty post-tenure review and Faculty Post-tenure Performance Improvement Plan to the provost by April 14 for approval and the approved plan and review are sent to the faculty member, college dean, and school chair for their records.", "marker": "a." }, { "id": "p52.11.2", "order": 17, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 90, "t": 156.24, "r": 530.88, "b": 103.2 }, "text": "For faculty members who do not submit a Faculty Post-tenure Performance Improvement Plan for review, do not develop and obtain an approved faculty performance improvement plan, or fail to implement a performance plan, the provost could recommend sanctions up to dismissal for the faculty member.", "marker": "b." } ] }, { "id": "p52.12", "order": 18, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 275.76, "t": 85.92, "r": 288.96, "b": 74.4 }, "text": "23", "attrs": { "block_label": "number" } }, { "id": "p52.13", "order": 19, "type": "footer", "bbox": { "l": 343.2, "t": 85.92, "r": 529.68, "b": 74.88 }, "text": "ALL POLICIES ARE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT", "attrs": { "block_label": "footer" } } ], "excluded_furniture": { "first": [], "last": [] } }