{
    "document_id": 10825,
    "page": 28,
    "width_pt": 612,
    "height_pt": 1008,
    "rotation": 0,
    "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48",
    "engine": "paddleocr_vl",
    "source_run_id": 10936,
    "item_count": 6,
    "counts_by_type": {
        "header": 2,
        "text": 4
    },
    "build_ms": 2,
    "items": [
        {
            "id": "p28.1",
            "order": 1,
            "type": "header",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 87.6,
                "t": 972.96,
                "r": 380.4,
                "b": 961.68
            },
            "text": "JACKSON TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 27, 2003",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "header"
            },
            "level": 2
        },
        {
            "id": "p28.2",
            "order": 2,
            "type": "header",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 469.68,
                "t": 972.96,
                "r": 523.2,
                "b": 961.2
            },
            "text": "Page 28 of 32",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "number"
            },
            "level": 2
        },
        {
            "id": "p28.3",
            "order": 3,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 86.16,
                "t": 922.56,
                "r": 504.24,
                "b": 505.44
            },
            "text": "MR. GUTTENTAG, 15 DEXTER LANE: He explained that in March of 2002 he was driving down Manhattan Street and took notice of the terrible condition of the street and the alignment job he was going to need after driving on it. He stated that he called the Public Works Department and spoke to who ever was in charge and was told that the road would be resurfaced in March of 2002. In July of 2002 the road was still not fixed and he then called the Township Administrator. He was told by him that there were two reasons the road was not being fixed, one being the school was getting a new gymnasium and they were concerned about construction trucks. The second reason was because a gas or water line had to be installed. He took notice on any given week there were 3 to 5 concrete trucks not having anything to do with the work using that road. He said he doesn't understand why they can't get Manhattan Street in decent condition for the people who live around there and use it the most. These people pay taxes and don't ask for much. He explained that he gives credit to someone who made some patches on the road, but basically most of those are gone. He said that he is really tired of getting the run around and would like to know when that road will be resurfaced? He later asked them to commit to a period of time. Committeeman Giblin explained that the plans have already been designed to have Manhattan Street done like he was told last year. When the Board of Education referendum was passed last year they knew that trucks will be going up and down that road and it wouldn't be the best time to do the road due to the heavy volume of trucks going to that school. Secondly, a water line was put into the Westlake property, the Mewes, and they already contacted the MUA who had the developer go out there and repatch. That road will be repaved, but we are still waiting for the completion of the gymnasium at the Holman school. The Public Works Director has asked this Township Committee to ban trucks from utilizing Manhattan Street. At the time the road is resurfaced the Township Committee will take that into consideration. He stated that this work should be completed by September of 2003. He really couldn't give a definitive timeframe because by the time they go out to bid, receive the bids back, and award the bids then they would start construction and all that takes time. He asked Mr. Gutteater to contact the MUA again and ask them about the one end where they tied into the water line."
        },
        {
            "id": "p28.4",
            "order": 4,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 87.12,
                "t": 479.28,
                "r": 499.92,
                "b": 296.64
            },
            "text": "VICKY RICKABAUGH, 5 STANLEY PLACE: She began by saying that asking for input from the people regarding the pool only came in the last couple of weeks. The swimming pool and recreation project has been in effect since 2001 and at no time did they ask for input back then. In 2002, November 7th, close to election, there was a quote saying that the Jackson Township Recreation Facility could be opened to the public as early as the end of 2003. She then said there is a conflict here saying that this will not cost the taxpayers anything and will totally be funded by private enterprise. The next minute you stated that it will cost the taxpayers money but we don’t know how much. She addressed Deputy Mayor Giblin and asked out of 566 towns how many have a municipal run pool? Deputy Mayor Giblin stated that he doesn’t have that information. This Township Committee has lowered taxes three years in a row and has continued to provide more recreational opportunities without raising taxes. He personally doesn’t care how many other towns have pools, he worries about the Jackson residents."
        },
        {
            "id": "p28.5",
            "order": 5,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 87.12,
                "t": 298.08,
                "r": 495.12,
                "b": 228.72
            },
            "text": "Committeeman Grisanti explained that this is exactly what they are asking the Recreation Commission to research. They needed a conceptual study, this is our dream, now we are going to see if it is feasible. He told Mrs. Rickabaugh that she is trying to turn this into a political issue. People should go before the Recreation Commission because they will be taking the input."
        },
        {
            "id": "p28.6",
            "order": 6,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 86.16,
                "t": 200.16,
                "r": 498.48,
                "b": 87.36
            },
            "text": "DENISE GARNER, 14 EVERGREEN COURT: (inaudible) She asked about the approval by the MUA for the water main? She said that they should know what these commissioners are doing because they appointed these people. Committeeman Broderick explained that after the 1,600 units were approved the developer also acquired 300 new acres that he can put homes on 3acre lots. The information regarding his extensions can be obtained from the planning office. He told her she would need to ask they MUA why they made that approval. They appointed some commissioners, but they can't tell them how to vote. He told her to speak to the two commissioners from the MUA that were"
        }
    ],
    "excluded_furniture": {
        "first": [],
        "last": []
    }
}