{ "document_id": 10766, "page": 5, "width_pt": 612, "height_pt": 1008, "rotation": 0, "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48", "engine": "paddleocr_vl", "source_run_id": 10877, "item_count": 21, "counts_by_type": { "header": 2, "text": 19 }, "build_ms": 5, "items": [ { "id": "p5.1", "order": 1, "type": "header", "bbox": { "l": 60.48, "t": 980.16, "r": 364.32, "b": 966.96 }, "text": "Jackson Township Planning Board Meeting of July 26, 2021", "attrs": { "block_label": "header" }, "level": 2 }, { "id": "p5.2", "order": 2, "type": "header", "bbox": { "l": 500.64, "t": 979.92, "r": 559.68, "b": 967.68 }, "text": "Page 5 of 6", "attrs": { "block_label": "number" }, "level": 2 }, { "id": "p5.3", "order": 3, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 60, "t": 955.92, "r": 569.52, "b": 904.8 }, "text": "housing to the closest restaurant pad, and if its moved there will be less truck traffic, people will be walking around the arena and the housing with trucks going in and out and if the housing is moved there is less polluting of the air, and the noise coming from Great Adventure and the water park was deafening and there is going to be apartments there and there is going to be a lot of people with noise issues." }, { "id": "p5.4", "order": 4, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 60.72, "t": 892.8, "r": 380.64, "b": 880.32 }, "text": "Tracy McKinney- Jackson Resident- sworn- asked if there was a sheriff camera review." }, { "id": "p5.5", "order": 5, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 60, "t": 881.04, "r": 577.2, "b": 815.76 }, "text": "M r. Rea stated the cameras being mentioned are the Ocean County Cameras that were installed by the County however there will be cameras installed from the applicant and the county is still collecting data and it has not been reviewed however a data analysis will be done by the applicant, and one thing with Anderson Road is M onmouth county has jurisdiction over this area and that area has been looked at for many years and it's a possibility for a roundabout for the Anderson Road intersection and near the outlets and there are no plans however the county will be addressing the intersection" }, { "id": "p5.6", "order": 6, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 60, "t": 804, "r": 573.6, "b": 714.96 }, "text": "Tracy McKinney- Jackson Resident- said the DOT was contacted about the ramp of 195 and it's the understanding that there was a chance that Jackson could purchase the right of way to construct the ramps, is that something that can be done prior to the approval of this phase Mr. Rea advised there have been numerous meetings with Monmouth and Ocean County and the DOT would be provided with a problem statement and the DOT have been asked to get included because it would require funding in order to get something done and its unsure if it's been done and it's an offsite intersection and as indicated before the applicant is going to pay a traffic impact fee for offsite traffic reports and that will be the construction to fix offsite conditions however it's a regional DOT issue and those issues were there long before this project" }, { "id": "p5.7", "order": 7, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 60, "t": 703.2, "r": 569.76, "b": 601.68 }, "text": "Tracy McKinney- Jackson Resident- said it would be in the best interest to have that situation addressed before building more\nMr. Wall stated it's wonderful the DOT has interest to come into Jackson and it appears that on the federal level, and the mayor has reached out to get someone in to have this addressed, and since there has been contact, it was asked to have them contact his office to come in as early as tomorrow. Mr. Gertner stated what is before the Board is the only thing that can be focused on, and it's on site implications and as testified there has been no contrary testimony there is a scheme to address certain off site implications. Dr. Campbell advised the Board can't use traffic off site in regards to a project like this. Mr. Gertner noted the Board can't use offsite in any mass. Dr. Campbell stated there are certain restrictions on what can be considered when voting on a project and off site traffic cannot be taken into consideration. Mr. Hudak noted that is the oath and law." }, { "id": "p5.8", "order": 8, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 61.2, "t": 588.96, "r": 559.2, "b": 567.12 }, "text": "Tracy McKinney- Jackson Resident- asked what is distance between phase 3 and the 1st access point, and is there a purposed walkway going to phase 4 will that be built with phase 3" }, { "id": "p5.9", "order": 9, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 60.72, "t": 564.48, "r": 327.36, "b": 551.52 }, "text": "Mr. Alfieri stated it will be built as phase 3, and its 2,200ft of a walkway." }, { "id": "p5.10", "order": 10, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 60.48, "t": 539.04, "r": 415.92, "b": 527.28 }, "text": "Tracy McKinney-Jackson Resident- asked does the water and sewer connect to Anderson Road." }, { "id": "p5.11", "order": 11, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 60.24, "t": 526.8, "r": 572.4, "b": 500.16 }, "text": "Mr. M acfarlane stated the project will have a water main that will connect to 537 and there is a pump station purposed. Mr. Borden stated there is an approval for phase1 and as far as phase 3 in concerned it will connect to an existing main on 537." }, { "id": "p5.12", "order": 12, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 60.72, "t": 488.64, "r": 564.24, "b": 438.96 }, "text": "Eric Davis- 210 Disbrow Hill Road, Millstone- sworn- had concern with the offsite traffic impact and there have been significant backups near six flags, and with warehouses and apartments and future commercial recreation facilities and restaurants, the traffic will increase, and it's been testified that this roadway is inadequate and there will be continued studies on what can be done, can that process be elaborated on and the timeline." }, { "id": "p5.13", "order": 13, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 60.96, "t": 437.52, "r": 576.24, "b": 398.64 }, "text": "Mr. Rea stated there is an application that needs to be made to the Ocean and M onmouth County Planning Board and data will be collected after the summer and there will be additional traffic studies and both counties will review the studies, and the latest plan is still in the concept phase, and there is no time frame that can be spoken too people are just getting back to in person work." }, { "id": "p5.14", "order": 14, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 60.48, "t": 386.88, "r": 462.24, "b": 374.88 }, "text": "Randy Bergmann- 5 Brentwood Drive- sworn- asked what the Board's opinion was on the flipping of phases." }, { "id": "p5.15", "order": 15, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 59.52, "t": 374.16, "r": 577.2, "b": 272.64 }, "text": "Mr. Alfieri stated as it relates to the comments, the warehouse project has been approved for some time now and is ready for the construction and the shifting of phases will not happen. Dr. Campbell stated this is very well done and everyone has ideas and some people in the professions have the right to express their ideas and the Board has to look at things as they come before the Board and the Board has already approved things in certain locations and some of it is interesting and town center is a great idea, and these would've been good ideas years ago however it's too late to flip areas, and the Board has to go with what is presented, and the ratable have to be considered and they are great ideas however the Board has to consider what is good for Jackson and have to be reasonable and allow developers to develop their projects, and this project will not only create beautiful living conditions it will create ratable, and it will bring lots of jobs and it will be something that the town can be proud of, and yes the traffic is bad however we have to look to the future." }, { "id": "p5.16", "order": 16, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 60, "t": 260.64, "r": 568.8, "b": 209.52 }, "text": "Randy Bergmann- 5 Brentwood Drive- mentioned when phase 2 made the approval there were things that needed to be done such as the offsite traffic study, and if that condition has not been considered yet how can phase 3 be approved.\n\nM r. Alfieri stated this phase 3 can be built independent of phase 2, and the warehouses don't ever have to be built to construct this and conditions to phase 2 have to be met, it's not an opinion so whatever is required to be done, it will be." }, { "id": "p5.17", "order": 17, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 60, "t": 198.24, "r": 574.8, "b": 134.4 }, "text": "Keith Jolliffe- 3 Holly Tree Court- sworn- said these ideas were addressed to Board and the Board disregarded the comments, and it was mentioned the sewer system on Anderson Road, can someone let the residents know when the construction will begin.\n\nMr. Borden advised it's fully approved and the time period is not known. Mr. Gertner asked if there is a timing issue with the MUA. Mr. Borden stated its contractor timing issue, and it would be assumed it will be within 6 months and it must be done before the fast food pads are done." }, { "id": "p5.18", "order": 18, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 61.2, "t": 122.16, "r": 575.52, "b": 98.16 }, "text": "Keith Jolliffe- 3 Holly Tree Court- asked if the berms that were mentioned during the phase 2 approval would be put up soon along with the vegetation." }, { "id": "p5.19", "order": 19, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 60.96, "t": 96.72, "r": 562.32, "b": 83.52 }, "text": "Mr. Borden advised he was not sure at this time. Mr. Alfieri stated there has been no building permits issued for the warehouse project." }, { "id": "p5.20", "order": 20, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 60.72, "t": 71.76, "r": 550.8, "b": 47.28 }, "text": "Keith Jolliffe- 3 Holly Tree Court- mentioned that it was testified there would be no construction with phase 2 until the ocean county studies were completed." }, { "id": "p5.21", "order": 21, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 60.72, "t": 45.6, "r": 369.84, "b": 33.12 }, "text": "Mr. Alfieri clarified that construction is the start to an actual building, not site prep." } ], "excluded_furniture": { "first": [], "last": [] } }