{ "document_id": 10368, "page": 2, "width_pt": 612, "height_pt": 792, "rotation": 0, "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48", "engine": "paddleocr_vl", "source_run_id": 10478, "item_count": 18, "counts_by_type": { "header": 1, "list": 2, "list_item": 5, "text": 10 }, "build_ms": 2, "items": [ { "id": "p2.1", "order": 1, "type": "header", "bbox": { "l": 71.185, "t": 751.5625, "r": 144.0422, "b": 714.4749 }, "text": "SMAA Minutes\nMay 24, 2021\nPage 2 of 5", "attrs": { "block_label": "header" }, "level": 2 }, { "id": "p2.2", "order": 2, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 70.7073, "t": 701.3148, "r": 540.3372, "b": 674.9946 }, "text": "two proposals and both firms were deemed by staff to be qualified and will present to the Board Authority." }, { "id": "p2.3", "order": 3, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 70.2295, "t": 664.4665, "r": 541.0539, "b": 601.2979 }, "text": "Mr. Bailey explained the general protocol for presenters and the voting process that would take place following the presentations. Under CCNA, no clear law exists, therefore, competing firms have the right to remain in the room while competitors are presenting. He advised that the tradition at the airport is for the firms chosen to present, leave the room during the other presentations, but it is not required." }, { "id": "p2.4", "order": 4, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 70.2295, "t": 591.2483, "r": 540.3372, "b": 552.4858 }, "text": "Each firm made presentations in alphabetical order: EXP U.S. Services, Inc. and Sweet Sparkman Architecture & Interiors. The Board selected the first-choice firm, with Mr. Bailey conducting the ballot voting process." }, { "id": "p2.5", "order": 5, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 69.9906, "t": 542.197, "r": 539.1429, "b": 515.8767 }, "text": "The ballot vote for first choice resulted in four votes for Sweet Sparkman Architecture & Interiors, and two votes for EXP U.S. Services, Inc. The Board ranked the firms as follows:" }, { "id": "p2.6", "order": 6, "type": "list", "bbox": { "l": 195.8782, "t": 505.5879, "r": 411.1054, "b": 480.7033 }, "text": "", "attrs": { "item_count": 2 }, "children": [ { "id": "p2.6.1", "order": 7, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 196.356, "t": 505.5879, "r": 411.1054, "b": 492.4278 }, "text": "Sweet Sparkman Architecture & Interiors", "marker": "1." }, { "id": "p2.6.2", "order": 8, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 195.8782, "t": 492.6671, "r": 318.8993, "b": 480.7033 }, "text": "EXP U.S. Services, Inc.", "marker": "2." } ] }, { "id": "p2.7", "order": 9, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 69.7518, "t": 480.9426, "r": 538.904, "b": 454.3831 }, "text": "Contract negotiations will begin with the first ranked firm of Sweet Sparkman Architecture & Interiors, and a contract will be brought back to the Board if successful." }, { "id": "p2.8", "order": 10, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 176.7681, "t": 444.0943, "r": 540.0984, "b": 356.5196 }, "text": "MOTION: Commissioner Spencer moved approval of the selected firms of Sweet Sparkman Architecture & Interiors as first ranked firm; and EXP U.S. Services, Inc. as second ranked firm; and for staff to negotiate scope and fees with the first ranked firm and if successful to present contract for approval at the next Board meeting and prepare all documents necessary to implement this action. Commissioner Biter seconded. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (6-0)" }, { "id": "p2.9", "order": 11, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 70.2295, "t": 333.7885, "r": 538.904, "b": 309.3825 }, "text": "5B. Approval: Approval: RFQ-04-2021-CMAR, Professional Construction Manager at Risk Services for Terminal Concourse B Renovations and New Concourse A Project." }, { "id": "p2.10", "order": 12, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 69.0351, "t": 308.9039, "r": 540.3372, "b": 257.9384 }, "text": "Mr. Piccolo advised staff received Request for Qualifications for a qualified firm capable of providing construction manager at risk to expand and upgrade existing Concourse B, and construction of a new Concourse A. Staff reviewed the submitted responses and selected three proposing firms to make presentations today at which time the Board will rank the firms." }, { "id": "p2.11", "order": 13, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 69.0351, "t": 247.8888, "r": 539.3817, "b": 221.8079 }, "text": "Each firm made presentations in alphabetical order: Beck-Envision; DeAngelis Diamond-Magnum Builders; and Halfacre Construction, with Mr. Bailey conducting the ballot voting process." }, { "id": "p2.12", "order": 14, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 68.7963, "t": 211.519, "r": 540.3372, "b": 148.829 }, "text": "The first and second ballot votes for first choice resulted in a three-way tie with two votes for Beck-Envision, two votes for DeAngelis Diamond-Magnum, and two votes for Halfacre Construction. The third and fourth ballot votes resulted in a two-way tie with three votes each for Beck-Envision and DeAngelis Diamond-Magnum, and no votes for Halfacre Construction. After discussion, The Board ranked the firms as follows:" }, { "id": "p2.13", "order": 15, "type": "list", "bbox": { "l": 212.3607, "t": 138.5402, "r": 412.7775, "b": 100.7347 }, "text": "", "attrs": { "item_count": 3 }, "children": [ { "id": "p2.13.1", "order": 16, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 212.5995, "t": 138.5402, "r": 412.7775, "b": 125.1408 }, "text": "DeAngelis Diamond-Magnum Builders", "marker": "1." }, { "id": "p2.13.2", "order": 17, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 212.8384, "t": 125.3801, "r": 295.4895, "b": 113.177 }, "text": "Beck-Envision", "marker": "2." }, { "id": "p2.13.3", "order": 18, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 212.3607, "t": 112.6985, "r": 335.8595, "b": 100.7347 }, "text": "Halfacre Construction", "marker": "3." } ] } ], "excluded_furniture": { "first": [], "last": [] } }