{ "document_id": 10209, "page": 52, "width_pt": 612, "height_pt": 792, "rotation": 0, "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48", "engine": "paddleocr_vl", "source_run_id": 10320, "item_count": 18, "counts_by_type": { "caption": 1, "figure": 1, "footer": 2, "header": 2, "heading": 1, "link": 1, "table": 1, "table_cell": 6, "text": 3 }, "build_ms": 3, "items": [ { "id": "p52.1", "order": 1, "type": "header", "bbox": { "l": 34.08, "t": 771.6, "r": 125.28, "b": 756.96 }, "text": "DISTRICT ONE", "attrs": { "block_label": "header" }, "level": 2 }, { "id": "p52.2", "order": 2, "type": "header", "bbox": { "l": 402, "t": 772.32, "r": 577.68, "b": 760.08 }, "text": "HIGHLANDS COUNTY Feasibility Study", "attrs": { "block_label": "header" }, "level": 2 }, { "id": "p52.3", "order": 3, "type": "figure", "bbox": { "l": 0, "t": 792, "r": 613.1339, "b": 737.9 }, "text": "", "attrs": { "source": "pdf_image" } }, { "id": "p52.4", "order": 4, "type": "heading", "bbox": { "l": 87.6, "t": 720, "r": 161.04, "b": 708 }, "text": "4.5. Summary", "attrs": { "block_label": "paragraph_title" }, "level": 3 }, { "id": "p52.5", "order": 5, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 67.92, "t": 703.44, "r": 543.12, "b": 603.36 }, "text": "In summary, general-purpose lane widening/capacity alternatives along US 27 alone may not fully address projected traffic demand and the need for improved safety, efficient freight movement, additional evacuation options and enhanced mobility options for all modes. The anticipated induced demand may cause further capacity constraints outside the improvement limits or push existing bottlenecks into Polk County between the Highlands County line and the CPP East or Poinciana Parkway Extension improvements. Additionally, the Build Alternatives evaluated are projected to result in increased crashes, especially nonmotorized crashes." }, { "id": "p52.6", "order": 6, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 67.92, "t": 592.56, "r": 543.36, "b": 448.08 }, "text": "Additional studies are recommended to look at a combination of Build Alternatives on and off the US 27 corridor to achieve a solution that increases regional mobility for all travelers and addresses the additional corridor needs not related to travel demand. This Study identified a potential change in character along the US 27 corridor that could be further understood through field data collection and analysis including planning-level study outreach to stakeholders. If no improvements are made to US 27 and its area of influence, conflicts will continue to persist with the anticipated land use changes and increases in vulnerable road user activity. The current US 27 corridor should be evaluated to better understand and address the needs for the motorized and non-motorized roadway users and address the context and purpose of the corridor, while maintaining efficient access to key business, residential, and activity centers and regional economic development." }, { "id": "p52.7", "order": 7, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 68.4, "t": 437.52, "r": 541.44, "b": 408.72 }, "text": "Table 16 shows a summary comparison of the 2045 conditions between the No-Build Alternative and the Build Alternative. Traffic volumes are slightly higher, but congestion levels remain in the same range.", "children": [ { "id": "p52.7.1", "order": 8, "type": "link", "bbox": { "l": 69.75, "t": 438.658, "r": 112.906, "b": 423.216 }, "text": "Table 16", "attrs": { "target_page": 52, "action_type": "/GoTo" } } ] }, { "id": "p52.8", "order": 9, "type": "caption", "bbox": { "l": 70.08, "t": 381.84, "r": 387.36, "b": 370.56 }, "text": "Table 16: 2045 Comparison of the Build and No-Build Alternatives Summary", "attrs": { "block_label": "figure_title" } }, { "id": "p52.9", "order": 10, "type": "table", "bbox": { "l": 109.92, "t": 368.88, "r": 500.64, "b": 215.28 }, "text": "", "attrs": { "block_label": "table", "n_rows": 2, "n_cols": 3, "integrity": { "cells_checked": 5, "cells_flagged": 0 } }, "children": [ { "id": "p52.9.1", "order": 11, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 109.92, "t": 368.88, "r": 240.16, "b": 343.28 }, "text": "", "attrs": { "row": 0, "col": 0, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "column_header": true, "header_source": "pdf" } }, { "id": "p52.9.2", "order": 12, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 262.8, "t": 363.64704, "r": 326.541648, "b": 348.87552 }, "text": "2045 No-Build", "attrs": { "row": 0, "col": 1, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "bbox_refit": true, "column_header": true, "header_source": "pdf" } }, { "id": "p52.9.3", "order": 13, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 412.68, "t": 363.64704, "r": 460.116672, "b": 348.87552 }, "text": "2045 Build", "attrs": { "row": 0, "col": 2, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "bbox_refit": true, "column_header": true, "header_source": "pdf" } }, { "id": "p52.9.4", "order": 14, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 127.32, "t": 337.87056, "r": 196.397856, "b": 218.86703999999997 }, "text": "Traffic (AADT)\nV/C Ratio\nLOS\nROW Impacts\nCosts (Million $)", "attrs": { "row": 1, "col": 0, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "bbox_refit": true, "merged_continuation": true } }, { "id": "p52.9.5", "order": 15, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 262.32, "t": 337.72704, "r": 326.958096, "b": 219.27552000000003 }, "text": "17,500-63,000\n0.86 – 1.23\nLOS C- LOS E\nN/A\nN/A", "attrs": { "row": 1, "col": 1, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "bbox_refit": true, "merged_continuation": true } }, { "id": "p52.9.6", "order": 16, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 404.04, "t": 337.72704, "r": 468.6792, "b": 219.27552000000003 }, "text": "17,500-71,500\n0.88 – 1.04\nLOS C- LOS E\n0-304 parcels\n$120M", "attrs": { "row": 1, "col": 2, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "bbox_refit": true, "merged_continuation": true } } ] }, { "id": "p52.10", "order": 17, "type": "footer", "bbox": { "l": 36.24, "t": 34.8, "r": 85.92, "b": 15.84 }, "text": "FDOT", "attrs": { "block_label": "footer" } }, { "id": "p52.11", "order": 18, "type": "footer", "bbox": { "l": 534.72, "t": 35.52, "r": 548.4, "b": 24.96 }, "text": "44", "attrs": { "block_label": "number" } } ], "excluded_furniture": { "first": [], "last": [] } }